BERGIN OIL & GAS CO. v. HOWARD

Annotate this Case

BERGIN OIL & GAS CO. v. HOWARD
1921 OK 240
199 P. 209
82 Okla. 176
Case Number: 7373
Decided: 06/21/1921
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BERGIN OIL & GAS CO.
v.
HOWARD, State Auditor.

Syllabus

¶0 1. Taxation--Gross Production Tax--Validity of Statute. The validity of the act approved March 11, 1915, and being article 2, subdivision A, section 1, chapter 107. Session Laws 1915, and amending section 7464, Revised Laws 1910, is affirmed by authority of case of In re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co. (No. 7426), found in 53 Okla. 24, 154 P.
2. Same--Case Overruled in Part--Nature of Tax. The holding in the above cited case that a gross production tax as provided in said provisions is an occupation tax and not a property tax, is overruled so far as material and in conflict with the holding in the case of In re Protest of Skelton Lead & Zinc Company's Gross Production Tax for 1919, decided in opinion by Chief Justice Harrison, April 5, 1921, 81 Okla. 134, 197 P. 495. A. A. Richards, Sherman, Veasey & Davidson, Carroll & Mason, Rice & Lyons, Randolph, Hayer & Shirk, E. H. Chandler, C. W. Grimes, John M. Chick, and C. C. Magee, of counsel, for plaintiff. S. P. Freeling, Atty Gen., and Smith C. Matson and J. H. Miley, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.

ELTING, J.

¶1 The same questions are involved in this case as were involved in the case of In re Gross Production Tax of the Wolverine Oil Company (No. 7426), found in 53 Okla. 24, 154 P. 362. The validity of said act was affirmed in said opinion. The questions raised in the instant case are decided by authority of said case, except wherein the court held said gross production tax to be an occupation tax instead of a property tax and in so far as such holding is material and inconsistent with the opinion by Chief Justice Harrison heretofore cited. The said holding in said opinion wherein it was held that said tax was an occupation tax is overruled, and we hold herein said tax to be a property tax and not an occupation tax, in conformity with the opinion rendered by Chief Justice Harrison (opinion filed April 5, 1921, and reported in 81 Okla. 134, 197 P. 495) entitled, "In re Protest Skelton Lead & Zinc Company's Gross Production Tax for 1919." The holding of Chief Justice Harrison on the nature of said tax is set out in the second paragraph of the sylllabus of his said opinion, and the law so defined in said second paragraph of the syllabus is held to be the law herein, and the validity of said act approved March 11, 1915, is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.