CULL v. CAVANAUGH

Annotate this Case

CULL v. CAVANAUGH
1919 OK 359
185 P. 828
77 Okla. 13
Case Number: 7948
Decided: 12/09/1919
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CULL et al.
v.
CAVANAUGH et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal.
When a case has been regularly assigned and submitted, and plaintiff in error fails to file brief or offer any excuse for not doing so, it will be presumed that the appeal has been abandoned, and the same will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Con Linn, Judge.

Action between M. B. Cavanaugh and others and M. E. Cull and others. From the judgment, the parties last named bring error. Dismissed.

Randolph, Haver & Shirk, for plaintiffs in error.
Pat Malloy, Gregg & Martin, and O'Meara & Sipe, for defendants in error.

BAILEY, J.

¶1 Petition in error and case-made in this case was filed in this court on December 30, 1915. Thereafter motion to dismiss said cause was filed and overruled. On June 25, 1917, said case was submitted and plaintiffs in error were given thirty days in which to file brief, and defendants in error twenty days thereafter within which to file answer brief. Neither party to this appeal has served or filed briefs or offered any excuse for failure to do so. It has been frequently held by this court, where a cause has been regularly assigned for submission and submitted, and the plaintiff in error fails to file a brief, or to offer any excuse for not so doing, it will be presumed that the appeal has been abandoned and the same will be dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.