FIRST STATE BANK OF WARNER v. PORTER

Annotate this Case

FIRST STATE BANK OF WARNER v. PORTER
1917 OK 123
182 P. 672
63 Okla. 79
Case Number: 8505
Decided: 01/30/1917
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

FIRST STATE BANK OF WARNER
v.
PORTER.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Time for Appeal-- Dismissal. Proceeding in error dismissed for the reason that same was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1910-11.

Ambrister & Ambrister, for plaintiff in error.
Neff & Neff, for defendant in error.

KANE, J.

¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground, among others, that the same was not commenced within the time provided by law. The record shows that the appeal was taken from a judgment rendered on the 12th day of February, 1916, and an order overruling the motion for new trial therein, which was entered on the first day of April, 1916. No summons in error has been issued or served up to this time. It, therefore, appears that the proceeding in error was not commenced within the time required by chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1910-11, which provides:

"All proceedings for reversing, vacating and modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of."

¶2 The proceeding in error, therefore, must be dismissed upon the authority of Shelton v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 79, 162 P. 1092.

¶3 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.