DODDER v. WASHITA LUMBER CO.

Annotate this Case

DODDER v. WASHITA LUMBER CO.
1915 OK 614
151 P. 679
51 Okla. 25
Case Number: 4826
Decided: 09/07/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

DODDER
v.
WASHITA LUMBER CO.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Presentation for Review--Dismissal--Case-Made--Time to Make and Serve--Extension. Where, in a case-made, there appears a purported journal entry of judgment, and a recitation that an order was made extending time to make and serve case-made, and the purported journal entry of judgment does not appear to have been filed by the clerk of the court, or entered in the court journal, and the case-made or transcript of the record does not contain the order extending time to make and serve case-made, and show that same has been filed with the clerk of the court, or entered in the journal, nothing is presented to this court for decision, and the cause will be dismissed.

Chas. T. Randolph, for plaintiff in error.
Phillips & Mills, for defendant in error.

McKEOWN, C.

¶1 This court will examine the transcript of the record, and case-made, to ascertain its jurisdiction; and when there appears a purported journal entry of judgment in the case-made, and a recitation that an order was made extending time to make and serve case-made, and the purported journal entry of judgment is not shown to have been filed by the clerk of the court, or entered in the journal of the court, and no order extending time to make and serve case-made being set out in the case-made, or shown to have been filed, or entered on the journal by the clerk of the trial court, this does not present anything to this court for decision, and a purported order of the trial judge extending time in which to make and serve a case-made is without force, when the case-made fails to show affirmatively that such order was made and entered. Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 P. 669. We recommend that this cause be dismissed.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.