CARTHAGE SUPERIOR MARBLE & LIMESTONE CO. v. HUGH McLENNAN & CO. et al.

Annotate this Case

CARTHAGE SUPERIOR MARBLE & LIMESTONE CO. v. HUGH McLENNAN & CO. et al.
1915 OK 479
149 P. 1074
48 Okla. 245
Case Number: 4696
Decided: 06/15/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CARTHAGE SUPERIOR MARBLE & LIMESTONE CO.
v.
HUGH McLENNAN & CO. et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Reversal- -Brief. Where plaintiff in error has completed his record and filed it in this court, and has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained; and, where the brief filed appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, the court may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition of plaintiff in error.

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge.

Action by the Carthage Superior Marble & Limestone Company, a corporation, against Hugh McLennan & Co., a corporation, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed and remanded.

Embry & Hastings, for plaintiff in error.

DUDLEY, C.

¶1 This is an appeal from the superior court of Oklahoma county. There was judgment for defendants in error, from which plaintiff in error has properly perfected an appeal to this court. It has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and defendants in error have neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. We have examined the record, and the brief appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, and, under the numerous authorities of this court, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained, but may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition of plaintiff in error. Phillips v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 99, 118 P. 371.

¶2 The judgment is therefore reversed and remanded.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.