HUNTER et al. v. CUDD et al.

Annotate this Case

HUNTER et al. v. CUDD et al.
1915 OK 445
152 P. 1130
48 Okla. 145
Case Number: 4584
Decided: 06/08/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HUNTER et al.
v.
CUDD et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal. Syllabus the same as in Bryan v. Umholtz, 42 Okla. 477, 141 P. 1107.

Error from District Court, Carter County;

S. H. Russell, Judge.

Action between Mayme Hunter and others and W. H. Cudd and others. From the judgment, Hunter and others bring error. Dismissed.

R. E. Bowling and Thompson & Patterson, for plaintiffs in error.
Sigler & Howard and W. I. Cruce, for defendants in error.
J. S. Garrison, for intervener.

DEVEREUX, C.

¶1 This case was docketed in this court on November 22, 1912, and regularly assigned for submission on June 7, 1915. No briefs have been filed, and no reason given for the failure to do so. Under the provisions of rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix) the appeal should be dismissed.

¶2 We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.