BENNETT v. MEEK

BENNETT v. MEEK
1915 OK 19
145 P. 767
45 Okla. 326
Case Number: 5372
Decided: 01/09/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BENNETT
v.
MEEK et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Frivolous Appeal--Dismissal. Where, upon examination of the petition in error and motion to dismiss, it is clearly disclosed that the appeal is manifestly frivolous and without merit, and taken for delay, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge.

Action by J. M. Meek and others against S. P. Bennett and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant Bennett brings error. Dismissed.

Harris & Nowlin, for plaintiff in error.
W. S. Pendleton, for defendants in error.

RIDDLE, J.

¶1 The parties will be designated here as they were in the trial court. Plaintiff sued defendants in the court below upon a promissory note in the sum of $ 300. Judgment was rendered by default against all defendants, except S. P. Bennett, who filed an answer consisting of a general denial. Plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. which was by the court sustained. From the judgment thus rendered, defendant Bennett prosecutes error.

¶2 It appears from the petition in error and motion to dismiss that there is no merit in the appeal; that same is frivolous, and prosecuted for delay. It was said by this court in the case of Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & C. Co., 43 Okla. 440, 143 P. 190:

"Where, upon the examination of the petition in error and the motion to dismiss, it is clearly disclosed that the appeal is manifestly frivolous and without merit, the appeal will be dismissed."

¶3 Skirvin v. Goldstein, 40 Okla. 315, 137 P. 1176.

¶4 Following the rule laid down in the cases supra, this cause should be dismissed; and it is so ordered.

¶5 All the Justices concur.