CUMMINS v. BRIDGES

Annotate this Case

CUMMINS v. BRIDGES
1914 OK 223
140 P. 1146
42 Okla. 200
Case Number: 3505
Decided: 05/12/1914
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CUMMINS
v.
BRIDGES.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Verdict--Evidence. Where there is competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict of the jury, under proper instructions from the court, this court will not disturb the verdict.

Error from County Court, Jefferson County; B. T. Price, Judge.

Action by W. J. Bridges against B. V. Cummins. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Bridges & Vertrees, for plaintiff in error
J. G. Clift, for defendant in error

RITTENHOUSE, C.

¶1 This is an action on a promissory note for $ 380.15, balance due on an open account for lumber. Defendant filed an answer, asking for credit of $ 223.39 for material returned; $ 7.05 for broken glass; $ 7 expended in obtaining glass; $ 50 for difference in price and grade of lumber; and $ 50 for damages. These questions were properly submitted to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of W. J. Bridges and against B. V. Cummins for $ 180.76. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, this court will not disturb the same.

¶2 The judgment of the lower court should therefore be affirmed.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.