MIDLAND VALLEY R. CO. v. STATE

Annotate this Case

MIDLAND VALLEY R. CO. v. STATE
1914 OK 188
140 P. 406
40 Okla. 660
Case Number: 4148
Decided: 04/14/1914
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MIDLAND VALLEY R. CO. et al.
v.
STATE.

Syllabus

¶0 RAILRRAILROADS--Orders of Corporation Commission--Appeal. The second section of the syllabus in A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State, ante, 138 P. 1026, is made the syllabus in this case.

Appeal from Order No. 557 of the Corporation Commission, requiring the appellants to erect a viaduct on First street in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Dismissed.

J. W. McCloud and Edgar A. de Meules, for appellant, Midland Valley Railroad Company
Clifford L. Jackson, W. R. Allen, and M. D. Green, for appellant, M., K. & T. Railway Company
Charles West, Atty. Gen., and Charles L. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from order No. 557 of the Corporation Commission requiring the appellants to build a viaduct over their respective roads at First street, in the city of Tulsa, Okla. Comes the Attorney General and moves to dismiss on the ground that said order is not appealable, citing A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State, ante, 138 P. 1026, where we held that an order requiring the railway company to construct a viaduct over its tracks and right of way in Guthrie was not an appealable order. As no distinction appears to us in the character of the two orders, inasmuch as both are orders requiring the correction of an abuse which affects the people of a particular community disassociated from the use of a railway for transportation of themselves and their property, and as appellants have filed no opposition to the motion, the same is sustained on the authority of our opinion in that case.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.