WALLACE v. GAY

Annotate this Case

WALLACE v. GAY
1913 OK 675
136 P. 737
39 Okla. 774
Case Number: 3162
Decided: 11/18/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WALLACE et al.
v.
GAY et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Presentation for Review--Motion to Reinstate. A motion to reinstate a cause, not presented in the transcript by bill of exceptions, so as to make it a part of the record, cannot be considered on appeal.

Petry & McConnell, for plaintiffs in error.
Lawson & Dabney, Garrett & Castleman, and W. C. Austin, for defendants in error.

 
ROBERTSON, C.

¶1 This case involves the consideration of the identical question decided by this court in its companion case, Hicks et al. v. Gay et al., 31 Okla. 150, 120 P. 636, and for the reasons therein given, this appeal should be dismissed.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.