DAGGS v. ELLIOTT

Annotate this Case

DAGGS v. ELLIOTT
1911 OK 86
114 P. 698
28 Okla. 452
Case Number: 975
Decided: 03/21/1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

DAGGS
v.
ELLIOTT.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Brief. Same as in Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 P. 71.

Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Presley B. Cole, Judge.

Action between J. M. Daggs and J. R. Elliott. From the judgment, Daggs brings error. Dismissed.

A. S. McKennon, for plaintiff in error.
J. S. Arnote, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, J.

¶1 On July 23, 1909, the plaintiff in error filed petition in error and case-made in this court. On January 9, 1911, the defendant in error filed a motion, which shows service upon the attorney for the plaintiff in error, asking that the appeal be dismissed on account of plaintiff in error's failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), which requires him to prepare and serve his brief upon the defendant in error within 40 days from the time of filing his petition in this court. Neither has this been done, nor has any response been made to said motion. The facts in this case are substantially the same as in Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 P. 71.

¶2 The appeal is dismissed.

¶3 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.