Ex parte Doser

Annotate this Case

Ex parte Doser
1949 OK CR 55
206 P.2d 228
89 Okl.Cr. 235
Decided: 05/11/1949
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

( Syllabus.)

1. BailAppeal Bond Reduced Where Evidence Justifies. An application on habeas corpus to reduce an appeal bond will be granted where petition and evidence offered at hearing justify reduction.

2. MurderPetitioner Held Entitled to Reduction of Bail From $25,000 to $10,000. One who is convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in State Penitentiary was entitled to have appeal bond reduced from $25,000 to $10,000, the amount of the original bond fixed by the district court, where she had been twice tried, one trial resulting in a hung jury, and in the other petitioner granted a new trial by the Criminal Court of Appeals.

JONES, P. J., dissenting.

Page 236

Proceeding in the matter of habeas corpus of Ann Doser, petitioner. Petition granted.

Brown, Darrough & Ball, of Oklahoma City, Joe Ralls, of Atoka, and Walter Billingsley, of Wewoka, for petitioner.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Owen H. Watts, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BAREFOOT, J. Ann Doser filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in this court, seeking reduction of her appeal bond.

Petitioner alleges that on or about January 26, 1946, a charge of murder was filed against her in the district court of Atoka county, Okla., and that the judge of said court fixed bail of said petitioner in the sum of $10,000, which petitioner made. That in May, 1946, petitioner was tried in the district court of Atoka county on the charge of murder and her trial resulted in a hung jury and she was permitted to stand on her $10,000 bail previously granted. That thereafter, and in October, 1946, she was again placed on trial for said charge and found guilty of murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment in the State Penitentiary.

That petitioner appealed from said judgment of the district court of Atoka county, and on February 9, 1949, the Criminal Court of Appeals reversed said cause and granted petitioner a new trial, 88 Okla. Cr. 299, 203 P.2d 451. That after the mandate was spread of record, petitioner made application to the district court of Atoka county for bail, and on March 8, 1949, the judge of said court fixed her bail at $25,000. That said bond is excessive; that petitioner is unable to make such bond, and prays that it be reduced, and she be granted bail in the sum of $10,000.

Page 237

A hearing was had in this court on said application on March 23, 1949, and evidence introduced. The court, after due consideration, was of the opinion that the bond fixed by the district court of Atoka county is excessive, and that under the circumstances herein $10,000 would be a reasonable bond in the premises.

The application for writ of habeas corpus reducing the appeal bond of petitioner from $25,000 to $10,000 is granted.

BRETT, J., concurs. JONES, P. J., dissents.

JONES, P. J. (dissenting). In my opinion this matter does not appear in the same circumstances as it did when bail was fixed in the sum of $10,000, after the first trial resulted in a hung jury. At the second trial the petitioner was convicted and given life imprisonment. This court after a review of the record found that her guilt of murder under the record was evident, but the cause was reversed because of certain errors in the proceedings.

Since this court after reviewing the record has held there was sufficient evidence to prove petitioner guilty of murder, I do not believe that the order of the trial court fixing appearance bond in the sum of $25,000 pending a new trial is manifestly erroneous. We are now passing upon a matter where all of the evidence has been presented to this court by record on appeal. By agreement, this complete record is to be considered as evidence in support of the state's response to the petition for reduction of bail.

I think, under all the circumstances of the case, the trial court acted correctly in allowing bail to the petitioner, but in view of our conclusion that the evidence is ample to sustain a conviction for murder, I feel that

Page 238

a $10,000 bond is insufficient, and therefore I respectfully dissent to the order fixing bond in such amount.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.