Raleigh v State

Annotate this Case

Raleigh v State
1931 OK CR 179
297 P. 1060
50 Okl.Cr. 345
Decided: 04/11/1931
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error Affirmance in Absence of Brief or Oral Argument.

Appeal from District Court, Latimer County; D.C. McCurtain, Judge.

J.B. Raleigh was convicted of the larceny of domestic animals, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Claud Briggs, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.

DAVENPORT, P.J. The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of larceny of domestic animals, and was sentenced to serve four years in the state penitentiary.

The case was tried in September, 1929, and the appeal lodged in this court in March, 1930. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

Page 346

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court, and no brief in support of the petition in error is filed, and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent, and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.