Ex parte Howell

Annotate this Case

Ex parte Howell
1926 OK CR 158
245 P. 66
34 Okl.Cr. 126
Decided: 04/19/1926
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Bail One Accused of Capital Offense Held Entitled to Bail as a Matter

Page 127

of Legal Right. In an application for bail in a capital case, evidence reviewed, and held to show that petitioner is entitled to bail as a matter of legal right.

Original application of Jack Howell for writ of habeas corpus to be admitted to bail. Bail allowed.

Gomer Smith, for petitioner.

The Attorney General, Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J.D. Holland, Co. Atty., opposed.

DOYLE, J. In this proceeding petitioner filed in this court, on March 6, 1926, a duly verified petition for writ of habeas corpus to be admitted to bail.

It appears that petitioner was committed by the county judge of Cleveland county, after a preliminary examination, and without bail, to answer in the district court of that county upon a charge of murder, alleged to have been committed on the 14th day of February, 1926, in killing W.B. Dickover, by driving a car, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in a reckless way, upon the public highway; that an application for bail was made to the judge of the district court of Cleveland county, and the same was denied; that the proof of guilt of murder is not evident, nor the presumption thereof great all of which is clearly shown by the testimony of said preliminary trial, a copy of the same being attached and made a part of the petition.

It is the uniform holding of this court that, under the constitutional provision (article 2, ยง 8) one charged with a capital offense is entitled to bail as an absolute right, unless the proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof great, and, in case the proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof great, the granting or refusing of bail is a matter of judicial discretion.

Upon a consideration of the testimony, we are of

Page 128

opinion that the petitioner is entitled to bail as a matter of legal right.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.