Gibson v State

Annotate this Case

Gibson v State
1926 OK CR 61
243 P. 986
33 Okl.Cr. 287
Decided: 03/02/1926
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors Conviction for Transporting Sustained.

Appeal from County Court, Pawnee County; L.N. Kimrey, Judge.

Walter Gibson, convicted of conveying intoxicating liquor, appeals. Affirmed.

McCollum & McCollum, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.

DOYLE, J. The information in this case charged that in Pawnee county January 30, 1923, Walter Gibson did convey and transport about two gallons of whisky from the residence of one Robert Berg to a point on the public highway a quarter of a mile north of said residence. On the trial the jury returned a

Page 288

verdict finding him guilty and fixing his punishment at a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for 90 days. He has appealed from the judgment, but no brief has been filed and no appearance made on his behalf in this court.

A number of errors are assigned but an examination of the record discloses that they are without merit.

The evidence for the state shows that on the day the Bank of Ripley was robbed, Sheriff Scott, of Pawnee county, and one of his deputies were patrolling the roads to intercept the bank robbers, and saw the defendant drive his car to Robert Berg's place, and shortly afterwards he drove back on the public highway, and seeing the officers said to the man in the car with him, "Break the jug." The sheriff stepped upon the running board and found a broken jug containing about a half pint of whisky and the rest of the contents spilled on the floor of the car. The defendant did not testify.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.