Ex parte Davis

Annotate this Case

Ex parte Davis
1925 OK CR 148
234 P. 228
29 Okl.Cr. 399
Decided: 03/17/1925
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Bail One Accused of Robbery with Firearms Held Entitled to Bail.

Application of Walter I. Davis for writ of habeas corpus to be admitted to bail. Bail allowed.

Page 400

Pryor, Stokes & Carver, for petitioner.

The Attorney General, for the State.

DOYLE, J. In this case petitioner, Walter I. Davis, by his attorneys filed and presented to this court a petition alleging that he is unlawfully imprisoned in the county jail of Seminole county by Blanch Doyle, sheriff of said county; that having been charged with the crime of robbery by firearms, and after waiving preliminary examination was committed without bail to answer to the district court of Seminole county, an application for bail was made to the district judge of said county. Petitioner alleges that he is not guilty of the crime charged, and that the proof of guilt is not evident, nor the presumption thereof great.

Attached to said petition is a transcript of the testimony taken upon the hearing before Judge Crump, presiding judge of said district court, on the application of the petitioner for bail. Upon a consideration of the evidence and the argument of counsel it was adjudged and ordered that petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $20,000. On September 22, 1924, an application to reduce the amount of the bail so fixed was made on the ground that petitioner has been unable to give bond in the amount fixed, and further showing that the jail in Seminole county is unsanitary and his further confinement is likely to prove injurious to petitioner's health.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.