Maxwell v. Lombardi
Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary
Want to stay in the know about new opinions from the Supreme Court of Ohio?
Sign up for free summaries delivered directly to your inbox. Learn More ›
You already receive new opinion summaries from Supreme Court of Ohio. Did you know we offer summary newsletters for even more practice areas and jurisdictions? Explore them here.
The Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals in a case involving an individual, Maxwell, suing Lombardi and others. The reversal was based on the authority of a previous case, Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp. The opinion does not provide details about the specific facts of the case or the legal issues involved. Therefore, the main holding is that the lower court's decision was reversed, relying on the precedent set by Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp.
Download PDF
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Maxwell v. Lombardi, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-4700.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2023-OHIO-4700 MAXWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMR. OF THE ESTATE OF MAXWELL, APPELLEE, v. LOMBARDI ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Maxwell v. Lombardi, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-4700.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp. (Nos. 2022-0781 and 2022-0890 Submitted December 20, 2023 Decided December 28, 2023.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 21AP-556, 2022-Ohio-1686. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp., __ Ohio St.3d __, 2023Ohio-4670, __ N.E.3d __. KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER, and DETERS, JJ., concur. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO _________________ Elk & Elk Co., Ltd., and R. Craig McLaughlin, for appellee, Joy L. Maxwell. Collins, Roche, Utley & Garner, L.L.C., and David L. Lester; and Poling Law, Brant E. Poling, and Sabrina S. Sellers, for appellants, Adolph V. Lombardi, M.D., and Joint Implant Surgeons, Inc. _________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
