In re D.D.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In re D.D., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5456.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-5456 IN RE D.D. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In re D.D., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5456.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed in part on the authority of In re D.S.—Appeal dismissed in part as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2015-1816—Submitted July 13, 2016—Decided August 23, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 2015CA0043, 2015-Ohio-3999. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the holding regarding due process on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184. {¶ 2} The remainder of the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PFEIFER, LANZINGER, and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S. and would order briefing on the issues raised in the remainder of the appeal. _________________ Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, D.D. _________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
