Carney v. Shockley

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Carney v. Shockley, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5824.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-5824 CARNEY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SHOCKLEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Carney v. Shockley, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5824.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau. (No. 2015-0235—Submitted August 31, 2016—Decided September 15, 2016.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Jefferson County, No. 14 JE 8, 2014-Ohio-5829. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5796, ___ N.E.3d ___, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio5793, ___ N.E.3d ___. O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. PFEIFER and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO _________________ Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., Steven J. Shrock, and Clinton Bailey, for appellant Todd H. Carney. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Eric E. Murphy, State Solicitor, Samuel C. Peterson, Deputy Solicitor, and Jennifer A. Barrett, Gerald E. Dailey, and Gene D. Park, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant state of Ohio. Hanna, Rasnick, Evanchan, Palmisano & Hobson, L.L.C., and Steven R. Hobson II, for appellees. _________________ 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.