State v. Rucker

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Rucker, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5633.] SLIP OPINION NO. 2012-OHIO-5633 STATE v. RUCKER. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Rucker, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5633.] (Nos. 2012-1097 and 2012-1218 Submitted December 5, 2012 Decided December 6, 2012.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals of Summit County, No. 26212, 2012-Ohio-2176. _______________ {ΒΆ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of State v. Moore, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2012Ohio-5479, ___ N.E.2d ___. The cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing regarding the mandatory fine. O CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee. Dewitt Rucker, pro se. __________________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.