Wilson v. Hudson
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Wilson v. Hudson, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4990.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2010-OHIO-4990 WILSON, APPELLANT, v. HUDSON, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Wilson v. Hudson, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4990.] Court of appeals judgment dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus affirmed. (No. 2010-1054 Submitted October 13, 2010 Decided October 20, 2010.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Pickaway County, No. 10CA13. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Lawrence E. Wilson, for a writ of habeas corpus. As the court of appeals properly held, habeas corpus is not available to raise Wilson s various claims. See Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, ¶ 1 (validity of charging instrument and ineffective assistance of counsel); Durain v. Sheldon, 122 Ohio St.3d 582, 2009-Ohio-4082, 913 N.E.2d 442, ¶ 1 (sentencing entry violating Crim.R. 32); Cammon v. Brigano, 101 Ohio St.3d 133, 2004-Ohio-316, 802 N.E.2d 656, ¶ 3-4 (improper jury instructions and SUPREME COURT OF OHIO erroneous admission of other acts evidence); Tucker v. Collins (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 77, 78, 591 N.E.2d 1241 (invalid waiver of counsel); Junius v. Eberlin, 122 Ohio St.3d 53, 2009-Ohio-2383, 907 N.E.2d 1179, ¶ 1 (actual innocence); State ex rel. Jaffal v. Calabrese, 105 Ohio St.3d 440, 2005-Ohio-2591, 828 N.E.2d 107, ¶ 5 (sentencing errors); Bussey v. Maxwell (1965), 2 Ohio St.2d 143, 144, 31 O.O.2d 236, 207 N.E.2d 244 (denial of right to fair trial); Tucker v. McAninch (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 423, 696 N.E.2d 595 (due process); Norris v. Wilson, Richland App. No. 04 CA 33, 2005-Ohio-4594 (violation of Crim.R. 43(A)). We deny appellant s motion to correct the case caption on his notice of appeal and merit brief. Judgment affirmed. BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Thelma Thomas Price, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. ______________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
