Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew, 122 Ohio St.3d 1225, 2009-Ohio-3724.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PETTIGREW. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew, 122 Ohio St.3d 1225, 2009-Ohio-3724.] (No. 2008-2082 Submitted July 2, 2009 Decided July 9, 2009.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Grady L. Pettigrew Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0029175, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of February 2, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F), suspended respondent for a period of six months, effective September 12, 2008, to run concurrently with the United States District Court suspension, and ordering that he will not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until he is reinstated before the United States Bankruptcy Court, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew, 120 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2009-Ohio-706, 901 N.E.2d 230. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. _____________________ STRATTON, O CONNOR,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
