Law v. Lake Metroparks

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Law v. Lake Metroparks, 116 Ohio St.3d 322, 2007-Ohio-6749.] LAW ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAKE METROPARKS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Law v. Lake Metroparks, 116 Ohio St.3d 322, 2007-Ohio-6749.] Adverse possession Real property owned by a park district Court of appeals judgment affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist. (No. 2007-0298 Submitted November 28, 2007 Decided December 20, 2007.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 2006-L-072, 2006-Ohio-7010. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist., 116 Ohio St.3d 148, 2007-Ohio-5586, 876 N.E.2d 1210. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist. O DONNELL, J., not participating. __________________ Redmond, Walker & Murray and Gerald R. Walker, for appellants. Gibson, Brelo, Ziccarelli & Martello and Joseph Gibson, for appellee. ______________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.