State v. Huffman

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St.3d 433, 2007-Ohio-4553.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HUFFMAN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St.3d 433, 2007-Ohio-4553.] Child pornography Court of appeals judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Tooley. (No. 2006-0799 Submitted August 14, 2007 Decided September 19, 2007.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-050044, 165 Ohio App.3d 518, 2006-Ohio-1106. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, ___ N.E.2d ___. {¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. III, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and James Michael Keeling, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Ravert J. Clark, for appellant. ______________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.