State v. Forbes
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Forbes, 114 Ohio St.3d 40, 2007-Ohio-2714.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. FORBES, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Forbes, 114 Ohio St.3d 40, 2007-Ohio-2714.] Sex-offender-classification hearing Court of appeals judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Wilson. (No. 2006-2294 Submitted May 23, 2007 Decided June 20, 2007.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 87473, 2006-Ohio-5612. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Wilson, 113 Ohio St.3d 382, 2007-Ohio-2202, 865 N.E.2d 1264. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary H. McGrath, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David L. Doughten, for appellant. ______________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
