Gustin v. Chaney
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Gustin v. Chaney, 112 Ohio St.3d 102, 2006-Ohio-6509.] GUSTIN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CHANEY ET AL, APPELLANTS. [Cite as Gustin v. Chaney, 112 Ohio St.3d 102, 2006-Ohio-6509.] Evidence Damages Collateral-source rule Court of appeals judgment affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates. (No. 2006-0655 Submitted November 15, 2006 Decided December 27, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Highland County, No. 05CA7, 2006-Ohio-1049. __________________ {ΒΆ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Gary D. Ostendarp and Paul N. Herdman, for appellees. Droder & Miller Co., L.P.A., Bradley A. Powell, and Jeffrey T. Kenney, for appellants. ______________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
