Norwood v. Burton
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Norwood v. Burton, 110 Ohio St.3d 416, 2006-Ohio-4554.] CITY OF NORWOOD, APPELLEE, v. BURTON ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Norwood v. Burton, 110 Ohio St.3d 416, 2006-Ohio-4554.] Eminent domain Court of appeals judgment reversed on the authority of Norwood v. Horney. (No. 2005-2314 Submitted August 31, 2006 Decided September 6, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, Nos. C-050065 and C-050070. __________________ {ΒΆ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Norwood v. Horney, 110 Ohio St.3d 353, 2006-Ohio-3799, 853 N.E.2d 1115. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. RESNICK, J., not participating. __________________ Manley Burke, L.P.A., Timothy M. Burke, Gary E. Powell, and Daniel J. McCarthy; and Rick G. Gibson, City of Norwood Law Director, and Theodore E. Kiser, Assistant Law Director, for appellee city of Norwood. Wood & Lamping, L.L.P., and Robert P. Malloy; and Institute for Justice, Dana Berliner, Scott G. Bullock, William H. Mellor, Robert W. Gall, and David Roland, for appellants. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Mark A. Vander Laan, Lawrence R. Elleman, Bryan E. Pacheco, and Richard B. Tranter, for appellee Rookwood Partners, Ltd. ______________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
