Bowling Green v. Chasteen
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Bowling Green v. Chasteen, 110 Ohio St.3d 179, 2006-Ohio-4093.] CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, APPELLANT, v. CHASTEEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Bowling Green v. Chasteen, 110 Ohio St.3d 179, 2006-Ohio-4093.] Traffic stop Probable cause Failure to observe traffic-control device Court of appeals judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings consistent with Bowling Green v. Godwin. (Nos. 2006-0780 and 2006-0841 Submitted July 18, 2006 Decided August 23, 2006.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-05-079. __________________ {ΒΆ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Bowling Green v. Godwin, 110 Ohio St.3d 58, 2006-Ohio-3563, 850 N.E.2d 698, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent therewith. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Matthew L. Reger, Bowling Green City Prosecutor, for appellant. ______________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
