Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 110 Ohio St.3d 157, 2006-Ohio-4087.] JOHN DOE NO. 1 ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 110 Ohio St.3d 157, 2006-Ohio-4087.] Statute of limitations Sexual abuse of minors Court of appeals judgment affirmed on the authority of Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati. (No. 2005-0262 Submitted June 20, 2006 Decided August 23, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, Nos. C-030900, C-030949, C-030950, and C-040072, 2004-Ohio-7003. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., not participating. __________________ PFEIFER, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 56-76. __________________ Kircher Law Office, L.L.C., and Konrad Kircher, for appellants. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Mark A. Vander Laan, and Kirk M. Wall, for appellees Archdiocese of Cincinnati and Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Stephen J. Wenke, for appellee Lawrence Strittmatter. ______________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
