State v. Tuttle
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Tuttle, 104 Ohio St.3d 242, 2004-Ohio-6392.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. TUTTLE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Tuttle, 104 Ohio St.3d 242, 2004-Ohio-6392.] Criminal law Prosecution for escape Court of appeals judgment reversed and cause remanded on the authority of State v. Thompson. (No. 2003-0573 Submitted November 30, 2004 Decided December 8, 2004.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 80775, 2003-Ohio419. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of appellant s remaining assignments of error and further action not inconsistent with State v. Thompson. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jon W. Oebker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Richard Agopian, for appellee. ____________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
