State ex rel. Shipp v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Shipp v. Indus. Comm., 101 Ohio St.3d 93, 2004-Ohio-25.] THE STATE EX REL. SHIPP, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Shipp v. Indus. Comm., 101 Ohio St.3d 93, 2004-Ohio-25.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2003-0941 Submitted December 1, 2003 Decided January 21, 2004.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 02AP-861, 2003Ohio-2190. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. __________________ Hochman & Roach Co., L.P.A., Gary D. Plunkett and Mark Kalafatas, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Phil Wright Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
