Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount, 100 Ohio St.3d 1244, 2003-Ohio-6215.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MOUNT. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount, 100 Ohio St.3d 1244, 2003-Ohio6215.] (No. 2002-1274 Submitted November 13, 2003 Decided November 14, 2003.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶1} On September 26, 2002, this court reciprocally suspended respondent, Dick Wilson Mount Jr., for one year, stayed the suspension, and placed respondent on probation for a period of one year with the condition that he could not apply for termination of probation in Ohio until his probation was terminated in the state of Florida. On September 29, 2003, respondent applied for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated September 26, 2002. {¶2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, Dick Wilson Mount Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0037553, last known business address in Minerva, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶4} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Mount, 97 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2002-Ohio-5446, 776 N.E.2d 492. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. __________________ 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.