State ex rel. Coach v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Coach v. Indus. Comm., 99 Ohio St.3d 547, 2003-Ohio-4699.] THE STATE EX REL. COACH, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Coach v. Indus. Comm., 99 Ohio St.3d 547, 2003-Ohio4699.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0631 Submitted August 26, 2003 Decided September 24, 2003.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-615. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. O CONNOR, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. O DONNELL, J., not participating. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶2} I agree that the Industrial Commission s order denying permanent total disability should be vacated and that this matter should be returned to the commission to issue a new order. However, I would further grant relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and Stephen P. Gast, for appellee and cross-appellant. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Erica L. Boss, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee. __________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
