State v. Teasley
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Teasley, 99 Ohio St.3d 1226, 2003-Ohio-4047.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. TEASLEY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Teasley, 99 Ohio St.3d 1226, 2003-Ohio-4047.] Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified due to want of conflict. (No. 2002-1298 Submitted June 3, 2003 Decided August 13, 2003.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1323, 2002Ohio-2333. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is a want of a conflict. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. __________________ Ron O Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Susan E. Day, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Andrew P. Avellano, for appellee. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
