Ward v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Ward v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 210, 2003-Ohio-3138.] WARD, APPELLANT, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Ward v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 210, 2003-Ohio-3138.] Torts Negligence Open-and-obvious doctrine remains viable in Ohio Court of appeals judgment affirmed on authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc. (Nos. 2002-0295 and 2002-0504 Submitted June 4, 2003 Decided July 2, 2003.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 2000L-171, 2001-Ohio-4041. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 N.E.2d 1088. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O CONNOR, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. O DONNELL, J., not participating. __________________ Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Patrick T. Murphy, for appellant. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and John O Neill, for appellee. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
