Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.] PEEBLES, EXR., APPELLANT, v. OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.] Insurance Motor vehicles Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage Homeowner s insurance policy Residence-employee exception Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 2002-0788 Submitted December 4, 2002 Decided December 23, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Fulton County, No. F-01-022, 2002-Ohio1518. __________________ {ΒΆ1} Although this cause was accepted for review and held for the decision in Lemm v. The Hartford, submitted with Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 97 Ohio St.3d 411, 2002-Ohio-6662, 780 N.E.2d 262, Lemm does not apply. This cause is therefore dismissed as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Boss & Vitou Co., L.P.A., and Mark F. Vitou, for appellant. Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Bahret, for appellee. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
