State ex rel. Rutledge v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Rutledge v. Indus. Comm., 97 Ohio St.3d 196, 2002-Ohio-5783.] THE STATE EX REL. RUTLEDGE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Rutledge v. Indus. Comm., 97 Ohio St.3d 196, 2002-Ohio5783.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0346 Submitted September 17, 2002 Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-498. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent, would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert E. Hof, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Bass, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
