Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace, 94 Ohio St.3d 1249, 2002-Ohio-1370.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALLACE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 1249.] (No. 99-1866 Submitted October 3, 2001 Decided March 6, 2002.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Paul Wallace, a.k.a. Paul Lawrence Wallace, Attorney Registration No. 0010369, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. The court coming now to consider its order of May 31, 2000, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED by this court that Paul Wallace, a.k.a. Paul Lawrence Wallace, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. For other cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 113, 729 N.E.2d 343; Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1434, 741 N.E.2d 896; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 414, 763 N.E.2d 1154, decided today. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
