State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc., 94 Ohio St.3d 440, 2002-Ohio-1242.] THE STATE EX REL. HOWARD, APPELLANT, v. SEAWAY FOODTOWN, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Howard v. Seaway Foodtown, Inc. (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 440.] Appellate procedure Court of appeals judgment affirmed Motions to strike, to certify the record to the United States Supreme Court, and to reverse and remand denied. (No. 01-1624 Submitted January 8, 2002 Decided March 20, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1097. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. The motion to strike, the amended motion to certify the record to the United States Supreme Court, and the motion to reverse and remand are denied. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Gregory T. Howard, pro se. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon and Margaret Mattimoe Sturgeon, for appellee Seaway Foodtown, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation and Industrial Commission. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
