Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach, 91 Ohio St.3d 1248, 2001-Ohio-73.] MEDINA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. MUHLBACH. [Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1248.] (No. 98-721 Submitted and decided March 27, 2001.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ On September 19, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of probation, and on March 5, 2001, he filed a notice of compliance. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated September 23, 1998, and its order dated February 15, 2001. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, P. Michael Muhlbach, a.k.a. Peter Michael Muhlbach, Attorney Registration No. 0058412, last known address in Parma, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. For earlier cases, see Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 224, 699 N.E.2d 459; and Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 547, 715 N.E.2d 1134. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent and would permit respondent to reapply no earlier than September 15, 2001. 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
