State ex rel. Hammock v. Indus. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Hammock v. Indus. Comm., 91 Ohio St.3d 248, 2001-Ohio31.] THE STATE EX REL. HAMMOCK, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Hammock v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 248.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 00-1589 Submitted February 27, 2001 Decided April 4, 2001.) APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1119. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Gallon & Takacs Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, Timothy T. Tullis and David M. McCarty, for appellee R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.