Hall v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Hall v. Cuyahoga Cty., 91 Ohio St.3d 203, 2001-Ohio-257.] HALL, ADMR., APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Hall v. Cuyahoga Cty. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 203.] Appellate procedure Final order Political subdivision tort liability R.C. 2744.02(C) Court of appeals judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (Nos. 00-844 and 00-955 Submitted February 28, 2001 Decided March 28, 2001.) APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, Nos. 77671 and 77666. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A., Richard L. Demsey and Kathleen St. John, for appellee. William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathleen A. Martin, Litigation Manager, Civil Division, for appellant Cuyahoga County. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., and Christopher M. Ernst, for appellant city of North Olmsted. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.