Maric v. Adams
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Maric v. Adams, 92 Ohio St.3d 209, 2001-Ohio-154.] MARIC ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ADAMS ET AL.; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Maric v. Adams (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 209.] Insurance Motor vehicles Mandatory offering of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage Subrogation Court of appeals judgment affirmed on authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth and Clark v. Scarpelli. (Nos. 00-874 and 00-1148 Submitted May 16, 2001 Decided July 5, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L142. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur in judgment. __________________ COOK, J., concurring in judgment. I concur in judgment based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concur in the foregoing opinion. __________________ Robert P. Rutter, for appellants. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., Henry A. Hentemann and J. Michael Creagan, for appellee. __________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
