State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm., 90 Ohio St.3d 522, 2001-Ohio-11.] THE STATE EX REL. LIGHT, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 522.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 00-677 Submitted November 14, 2000 Decided January 10, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-722. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and James A. Whittaker, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.