State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 88 Ohio St.3d 225, 2000-Ohio-305.] THE STATE EX REL CHRYSLER CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; MAJEWSKI, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 225.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1912 Submitted February 8, 2000 Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD02-270. __________________ Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas J. Gibney and Margaret A. Mattimoe, for appellant. Fell, Marcus & Koder Co., L.P.A., George N. Fell II and Lisa A. Grego, for appellee. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.