State ex rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE STATE EX REL. THOMAS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm. (1999), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 98-870 Submitted November 10, 1998 Decided January 20, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD04-560. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jon D. Grandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents and would order relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
