O'Sullivan v. Provident Bancorp, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as O Sullivan v. Provident Bancorp, Inc. (1999), ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 1999-Ohio-426.] O SULLIVAN, APPELLANT, v. PROVIDENT BANCORP, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as O Sullivan v. Provident Bancorp, Inc. (1999), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-235 Submitted January 26, 1999 Decided March 3, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970141. __________________ Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook, Robert E. Manley and Robert H. Mitchell, for appellant. Keating, Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L., James E. Burke, Daniel E. Izenson and Douglas L. Hensley, for appellees. __________________ The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
