State v. Price
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. PRICE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Price (1999), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Criminal law Sentencing Court of appeals judgment reversed on authority of State v. Rush. (No. 98-1973 Submitted January 12, 1999 Decided March 3, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 97-CA-47. __________________ James J. Mayer, Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sheryl M. Groff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. __________________ The discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Rush (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
