Mullins v. Rio Algom, Inc.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MULLINS ET AL. v. RIO ALGOM, INC. ET AL. [Cite as Mullins v. Rio Algom, Inc. (1999), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Employer and employee Cause of action brought by employee alleging intentional tort by employer in workplace R.C. 2745.01 is unconstitutional in its entirety. (No. 97-2491 Submitted March 31, 1999 Decided April 28, 1999.) ON ORDER from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, Certifying a Question of State Law, No. C-1-97-73. __________________ Casper & Casper and Arthur B. Casper, for petitioners Mark Mullins et al. Lindhorst & Dreidame, William M. Cussen and Brian M. Kneafsey, Jr., for respondents Rio Algom, Inc. et al. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Arthur J. Marziale, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-respondent Ohio Attorney General. Michael R. Thomas, in support of petitioners, for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy, in support of petitioners, for amicus curiae Ohio AFL-CIO. Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook and Andrew S. Lipton, in support of petitioners, for amicus curiae Armco Employees Independent Federation, Inc. __________________ The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, has certified the following question to us: Is Section 2745.01 of the Ohio Revised Code unconstitutional under state law thereby rendering Ohio Revised Code Section 2305.11.2 null and void? The certified question is answered in the affirmative on the authority of Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 298, 707 N.E.2d 1107. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.