State v. Livingston
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Livingston, 86 Ohio St.3d 618, 1999-Ohio-211.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. LIVINGSTON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Livingston (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 618.] Criminal law Where single indictment contains felony and misdemeanor counts, speedy-trial provisions in R.C. 2945.71(B) must be applied to the misdemeanor counts Court of appeals judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Hughes. (No. 99-243 Submitted August 25, 1999 Decided September 29, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-980301. __________________ Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Tina I. Ernst, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Kenneth L. Lawson & Associates and Kenneth L. Lawson, for appellee. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hughes (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 424, 715 N.E.2d 540. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority s judgment for the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Hughes (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 424, 715 N.E.2d 540.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
